Explore how QLD’s tech-heavy approach stacks up against SSO’s broader diversification for leveraged ETF investors. ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD +4.16%) stands out for its deeper tech focus, higher recent returns, and steeper drawdowns compared to ProShares - Ultra S&P500 (SSO +3.87%), while also carrying a marginally higher fee and lower yield. This comparison lines up two leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from ProShares, each aiming to deliver two times the daily performance of a major U.S. equity index: SSO tracks the S&P 500, while QLD targets the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100. Both are designed for tactical traders seeking amplified exposure, but their index choices lead to meaningful differences in risk and return. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric SSO QLD Issuer ProShares ProShares Expense ratio 0.87% 0.95% 1-yr return (as of 2026-01-30) 21.0% 27.6% Dividend yield 0.6% 0.2% Beta 2.01 2.31 AUM $7.8 billion $10.7 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. QLD charges a slightly higher fee than SSO, making SSO more affordable for cost-sensitive traders, while QLD’s yield is notably lower, offering less in the way of income for those who value payouts. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric SSO QLD Max drawdown (5 y) -46.77% -63.78% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,573 $2,370 What's Inside QLD seeks to double the daily returns of the Nasdaq-100, resulting in a portfolio that is highly concentrated in technology (53%), with additional weightings in communication services (17%) and consumer cyclical stocks (13%). Its top holdings—Nvidia Corp (NVDA +8.01%), Apple Inc (AAPL +0.87%), and Microsoft Corp (MSFT +1.90%)—comprise a sizable portion of assets, and the fund holds 121 positions. QLD has been operating for nearly 20 years and, like SSO, features a daily leverage reset, which can cause performance to diverge from the index over longer h...

With Greg Abel now at the helm, some investors are nervous about the company Warren Buffett built. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A +0.74%) (BRK.B +0.80%) has a track record of excellence that's hard for any other stock to match. A big part of Berkshire's success has come as a result of its legendary leader, Warren Buffett, who just stepped down as CEO at the end of 2025. With decades of market outperformance under Buffett's belt, successor CEO Greg Abel has his work cut out for him to build on his predecessor's legacy. Today, this three-part series on Berkshire Hathaway for the Voyager Portfolio concludes with a closer look at the CEO succession from Buffett to Abel and what investors can expect. And although I won't be adding Berkshire Hathaway stock to this portfolio, that doesn't mean that you shouldn't strongly consider it as a complement to the other individual stock holdings you may own. The inevitable passing of the baton Given Buffett's incredible tenure at Berkshire, succession has been in the forefront of shareholders' minds for a long time. For years, Buffett and former vice-chair Charlie Munger reassured Berkshire stock investors by stating that there was a plan in place without providing specifics. Then, in 2021, Berkshire announced that its board of directors had unanimously supported Abel to be Buffett's designated successor. After that, Buffett said encouraging things about Abel's prowess on multiple occasions. Buffett is on record saying he'd rather have Abel managing his finances than any of a host of other corporate leaders or investment advisors. He even said that Abel has better management skills than he does, highlighting the important need for any Berkshire CEO to manage the conglomerate's subsidiaries adeptly while still leaving day-to-day operational decisions to respective leaders at each subsidiary. That's been a key ingredient in Berkshire's past success. Setting Abel up for success Perhaps the most valuable thing that Berkshire and Buffett did...

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has minimal fees and offers investors an easy way to track the market. Investing in the stock market doesn't have to be complicated. By simply tracking the S&P 500 (^GSPC +1.97%), which is an index of the largest companies in the U.S., you can be confident that your portfolio will rise in value over the long term. While there will be bumps and bad years along the way, the index has continually recovered and grown in value. There are many exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the index, and they can make for solid long-term investments. What's key, however, is to focus on low-cost funds. These types of investments will ensure that fees aren't putting a big dent into your overall returns. One of the best low-cost funds to buy today is the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO +1.95%). Minimizing fees should be a priority for long-term investors One of the most appealing features of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is its efficiency. At 0.03%, it's hard to find a lower expense ratio than what this ETF charges. That means if you were to invest $10,000 into this fund, you'd be incurring fees totaling just $3 per year. As your balance increases, your fees will also rise -- but they will still be fairly minimal. Over time, fees can add up, and even a single percentage point difference in your portfolio's performance can have a significant impact. Consider if the S&P 500 were to rise by around 10% per year, which is what it has averaged historically, for 30 years. A $50,000 investment would grow to be worth around $872,000. But if your return averaged a percentage point lower, at around 9%, then your investment would be worth approximately $663,000 -- a difference of nearly $210,000. This is why paying attention to fees is crucial for long-term investors, as ignoring them could result in significantly worse returns. Expand NYSEMKT : VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Today's Change ( 1.95 %) $ 12.14 Current Price $ 635.24 Key Data Points Day's Range $ 626.20 - $ 636.72 52wk Ra...

There are times when the best thing for a side is an uneventful win. Titles are won less in the big set-piece games than against mid-table sides in the easily forgotten circumstances of a Saturday afternoon. Arsenal weren’t brilliant against Sunderland, but they were good enough to win comfortably, and that increases their lead at the top of the table to nine points, adding a degree of extra pressure to Manchester City’s Sunday visit to Liverpool. In a way, this was the platonic ideal of Mikel Arteta’s football. Not a huge amount happened but most of what did was in or around the Sunderland box. It was bitty, stop-start, built around set-plays and devoid of much in the way of imagination or spontaneity. Coaches obsessed by pressing patterns probably loved it, but it will not live long in the wider collective memory. For a long time the game seemed in danger of being mutually respected out of existence, both teams watching, probing warily, even if in the end Arsenal’s probing proved far more dangerous. Continue reading...

For Burnley this felt like the beginning of their Premier League farewell tour, while West Ham reignited their fight for survival. In truth, there was little between the two but the Hammers showed why they have hope of staying up, providing the brief moments of quality, something the Lancastrians could not. Crysencio Summerville and Taty Castellanos expertly finished from two perfect assists to send West Ham to victory, leaving them three points adrift of 17th-placed Nottingham Forest, the place above the relegation spots. Burnley showed fight in the second half but a 16th straight game without a win, including 11 defeats, brought derision from the home supporters and demands for change in the dugout and boardroom. There was more than an air of resignation around Turf Moor before the first whistle was blown. Nothing in the opening 12 minutes suggested either team had the desire or capability to get out of the relegation zone as the game began at a pedestrian pace. Burnley, as Scott Parker puts it, are often on the wrong side of the Premier League’s “fine margins” but it is often of their own making. On this occasion, Lucas Pires gave the ball away needlessly on the halfway line, Mateus Fernandes broke and slipped a precise pass through to Summerville, who reminded Kyle Walker of his advancing years, before dinking over Martin Dúbravka. Neither fans are happy with life but the visitors were more vocal, chanting “sack the board” in the hope of ousting Karren Brady and David Sullivan, though Burnley supporters were not short of toxicity come the 26th minute. The second was far too easy as El Hadji Malick Diouf was afforded the left wing to himself, allowing him to send in a perfect cross, headed home by Castellanos, who did well to get across his man. Boos rang out at Turf Moor, in the knowledge getting back into the match was nigh-on impossible for Burnley. At least when in a difficult situation at the turn of the year, West Ham acted in the market to bring new player...

Explore how sector focus and dividend strategy set these two leading ETFs apart for investors seeking income or growth. Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG +2.19%) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD +1.61%) stand out for their low costs and focus on dividend growth, but SCHD’s yield more than doubles VIG’s, while VIG has delivered stronger recent returns and heavier tech exposure. Both funds aim to provide diversified exposure to U.S. companies with robust dividend track records, but their strategies and sector bets differ. This comparison unpacks how VIG and SCHD stack up on cost, yield, performance, risk, and portfolio construction to help investors pinpoint the best fit for their income and growth goals. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric VIG SCHD Issuer Vanguard Schwab Expense ratio 0.05% 0.06% 1-yr return (as of Jan. 30, 2026) 10.4% 6.6% Dividend yield 1.6% 3.5% Beta 0.85 0.77 AUM $103.1 billion $77.3 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. SCHD carries a marginally higher expense ratio than VIG, but the difference is only 0.01 percentage points—practically negligible for most investors. Where SCHD stands out is its much higher dividend yield, offering a substantially larger payout than VIG. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric VIG SCHD Max drawdown (5 y) -20.39% -16.86% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,617 $1,393 What's Inside SCHD tracks 101 U.S. companies screened for dividend strength and quality, with the fund now over 14 years old. Its biggest sector allocations are energy (19%), consumer defensive (18%), and healthcare (18%). The top holdings include Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT +2.36%), Texas Instrument Inc (TXN 1.15%), and Chevron Corp (CVX +1.03%), giving the portfolio a notable tilt toward industrials and oil majors. VIG, by contrast, spreads its assets across 338 holdings, favoring technology (28%), financ...

Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St. Nvidia is investing $2b in CoreWeave and expanding their collaboration to build AI infrastructure. CoreWeave is integrating its software platforms more deeply into Nvidia's ecosystem. The company has launched its first integrated brand campaign during the Winter Olympics. CoreWeave introduced CoreWeave ARENA, an AI native platform for testing and optimizing enterprise AI workloads at scale. CoreWeave, trading as NasdaqGS:CRWV, is drawing fresh attention after Nvidia's $2b commitment and closer partnership around AI data centers. The stock last closed at $89.95, with a 16.5% return over the past 30 days and a 13.4% return year to date, while the 7 day return shows a 3.5% decline. For investors watching the buildout of AI infrastructure, this combination of capital, partnerships and recent share price moves helps frame where CoreWeave currently sits in the public markets. Alongside the Nvidia deal, the Winter Olympics brand campaign and the launch of CoreWeave ARENA indicate that the company is working to stand out with both enterprises and developers. For readers, a key consideration is how CoreWeave will seek to translate this expanded collaboration and new platform into adoption of its AI infrastructure and software offerings over time. Stay updated on the most important news stories for CoreWeave by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on CoreWeave. NasdaqGS:CRWV 1-Year Stock Price Chart Why CoreWeave could be great value Investor Checklist Quick Assessment ❌ Price vs Analyst Target : At US$89.95, CoreWeave trades about 29% below the US$127.22 analyst consensus target, but with a very wide target range from US$41 to US$251. ❌ Simply Wall St Valuation : Shares are described as trading 161.6% above estimated fair value, which flags a stretched valuation on this model. ✅ Recent M...

Find your next quality investment with Simply Wall St's easy and powerful screener, trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide. Tesla (NasdaqGS:TSLA) is winding down production of its Model S and Model X vehicles to convert facilities for large scale Optimus humanoid robot manufacturing. The company is publicly repositioning itself from a primarily electric vehicle maker to an AI and robotics focused business. Speculation continues around a possible combination of Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, which could reshape how these businesses operate and are funded. For investors, this shift reframes Tesla from an auto manufacturer to a broader technology and automation platform. Humanoid robotics and AI remain early in commercial adoption, and Tesla is tying its identity and capital allocation more closely to those themes rather than to legacy premium EV models such as the Model S and Model X. Key questions include how quickly Tesla can scale Optimus production, what real world use cases emerge, and whether any merger with SpaceX or xAI moves beyond speculation. These developments may influence how the market evaluates Tesla’s risk profile, revenue mix, and its role across mobility, robotics, and AI infrastructure. Stay updated on the most important news stories for Tesla by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on Tesla. NasdaqGS:TSLA 1-Year Stock Price Chart Why Tesla could be great value Investor Checklist: Tesla’s AI and Robotics Pivot Quick Assessment ⚖️ Price vs Analyst Target : At US$411.11, the share price sits about 2% below the US$418.81 analyst price target, which is within the 10% band. ❌ Simply Wall St Valuation : Tesla is described as trading at about 212.8% above estimated fair value, which flags a rich valuation. ❌ Recent Momentum: The 30 day return of roughly 4.7% decline shows recent softness in the share price as this new direction beds in. Check out Simply Wall St's in depth va...

Explore how IEFA’s developed-market focus and cost structure stack up against IEMG’s emerging-market exposure and sector mix. While both the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG +2.50%) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA +2.27%) offer broad international equity exposure at low cost, IEFA trades at a marginally lower expense ratio and yields more, whereas IEMG has outperformed over the past year and covers riskier, higher-growth emerging markets. IEMG and IEFA are both core international ETFs from iShares, but they track different global slices: IEMG focuses on emerging markets, while IEFA excludes the U.S. and Canada, and emerging economies, instead targeting developed markets in Europe, Asia, and Australia. This comparison highlights where each fund stands on cost, performance, risk, portfolio makeup, and trading ease. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric IEMG IEFA Issuer IShares IShares Expense ratio 0.09% 0.07% 1-yr return (as of 2026-01-30) 35.3% 26.6% Dividend yield 2.5% 3.4% Beta 0.65 0.85 AUM $141.4 billion $174.1 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. IEFA looks a bit more affordable with its 0.07% fee compared to IEMG’s 0.09%, and it also pays a higher dividend yield by nearly a full percentage point, which may appeal to income-focused investors. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric IEMG IEFA Max drawdown (5 y) -37.16% -30.41% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,106 $1,353 What's Inside IEFA holds about 2,589 developed-market stocks across Europe, Asia, and Australia, with its largest sector weights in financial services (22%), industrials (20%), and healthcare (11%). Top positions include ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding Par AG, and HSBC Holdings PLC. The fund has a 13.3-year track record and is designed to mirror developed markets outside North America. IEMG, in contrast, tracks around 2,725 stocks from emerging eco...

There are several great investment opportunities in the AI sector. If you've got $5,000 ready to invest that isn't needed for monthly bills or to boost an emergency fund, I've got a list of stocks that look like excellent buys. All of them are key beneficiaries of massive artificial intelligence (AI) spending and look primed to soar throughout this year and many years to come. I think Nvidia (NVDA +8.01%), Broadcom (AVGO +7.26%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM +5.48%), and Microsoft (MSFT +2.00%) all make for excellent buys right now and should crush the market moving forward. Nvidia Nvidia, the world's most valuable company (as measured by market cap), has risen to this level thanks to insatiable demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs). These computing units have become the primary option for training and running AI models. Even after the company saw three years of strong growth, 2026 looks like another great one. Expand NASDAQ : NVDA Nvidia Today's Change ( 8.01 %) $ 13.77 Current Price $ 185.65 Key Data Points Market Cap $4.5T Day's Range $ 174.62 - $ 187.00 52wk Range $ 86.62 - $ 212.19 Volume 8.9M Avg Vol 183M Gross Margin 70.05 % Dividend Yield 0.02 % Wall Street analysts expect 52% growth for Nvidia in fiscal 2027 (which just began and will end in January 2027). While some investors may be worried about investing in Nvidia's stock right now because an AI bubble may be forming, the reality is far from that. Nvidia is providing the picks and shovels for the AI gold rush. It will do just fine even if the gold rush eventually peters out. With its strong projected growth over multiple years, Nvidia stock is a no-brainer buy for me right now. Broadcom One company challenging Nvidia's dominance in the AI chip sector is Broadcom. Instead of launching a competing GPU, Broadcom is taking a different approach. It has designed ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) that are getting a lot of attention from AI hyperscalers. ASICs optimize the com...

Key Points Silver prices are up 6% for 2026 after extreme volatility in both directions. Wheaton Precious Metals has returned 98% over the last 12 months, but by one metric, shares are cheaper than a year ago. Whether or not it's a buy at today's levels comes down to one question. 10 stocks we like better than Wheaton Precious Metals › Amid all the volatility silver prices have seen in 2026, they are still up by double digits for the year as of early February. Shares of Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE: WPM) are up 11.4% year to date, and zooming out over the last 12 months, they have returned 98%. Looking at the precious metals company's rise, it's natural to wonder if its rally is over. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 59 certainly makes it look expensive at first glance, considering that the average S&P 500 company is priced far more cheaply with a P/E ratio of 29.6. ' Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks » Yet there's one good reason to think that this stock is actually much cheaper than it appears. Not only that, it's even cheaper than it was a year ago, before its near-100% rally. Putting Wheaton Precious Metals' valuation in context To understand this company's valuation, you need to know its business model. Wheaton Precious Metals doesn't mine silver, gold, or any other metal. Instead, it provides financing for mining projects in return for the right to buy portions of the mines' future output at heavily discounted prices. For instance, the company's 2023 deal with Waterton Copper entitles it to buy hundreds of thousands of ounces of silver from the latter's Mineral Park Mine in Arizona for a whopping 82% discount to spot price in return for $300 million in up-front financing. As another example, it bought the right to buy up to 18 million ounces of future silver production from the Blackwater mine in Cariboo, Canada, at...

Key Points Nvidia and Broadcom are each vying for AI computing unit market share. Taiwan Semiconductor fabricates most chips used in AI. Microsoft stock looks like a bargain following its earnings report. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › If you've got $5,000 ready to invest that isn't needed for monthly bills or to boost an emergency fund, I've got a list of stocks that look like excellent buys. All of them are key beneficiaries of massive artificial intelligence (AI) spending and look primed to soar throughout this year and many years to come. I think Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM), and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) all make for excellent buys right now and should crush the market moving forward. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks » Nvidia Nvidia, the world's most valuable company (as measured by market cap), has risen to this level thanks to insatiable demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs). These computing units have become the primary option for training and running AI models. Even after the company saw three years of strong growth, 2026 looks like another great one. Wall Street analysts expect 52% growth for Nvidia in fiscal 2027 (which just began and will end in January 2027). While some investors may be worried about investing in Nvidia's stock right now because an AI bubble may be forming, the reality is far from that. Nvidia is providing the picks and shovels for the AI gold rush. It will do just fine even if the gold rush eventually peters out. With its strong projected growth over multiple years, Nvidia stock is a no-brainer buy for me right now. Broadcom One company challenging Nvidia's dominance in the AI chip sector is Broadcom. Instead of launching a competing GPU, Broadcom is taking a different approach. It has designed ASICs (application-specific...

The Best Stocks to Invest $5,000 in Right Now Nasdaq

Andrii Dodonov A weekly overview of insider trading, highlighting significant purchases and sales by investors, directors, and executives. The transactions occurred between February 2, 2026, and February 6, 2026. Johnson & Johnson ( JNJ ) CEO Joaquin Duato sold 100,000 shares in the price range of $220.99 to $221.48 per share, for a total of $22.12M. Following the transaction, he continues to hold 307,807 shares. Johannes Oosthuizen, President of the U.S. Market at Merck ( MRK ), disposed of 15,000 shares at an average price of $121.87 per share, totaling $1.83M. His holdings stood at 21,197 shares after the sale. At Micron Technology ( MU ), EVP of Global Operations Manish Bhatia sold a total of 26,623 shares within the price range of $388.78 to $395.87 per share, resulting in proceeds of $10.41M. He continues to hold 323,486 shares. Goldman Sachs ( GS ) disclosed two insider sales in the week. CEO David Solomon let go of 272 shares at an average price of $938.92 per share for $255,387, retaining 16,171 shares. Meanwhile, Global Treasurer Carey Halio sold 2,846 shares in the price range of $921.25 to $932.81 per share for total proceeds of $2.64M, leaving her with 2,017 shares. Daniel Simkowitz, co-president at Morgan Stanley ( MS ), sold 32,968 shares at an average price of $182.61 per share, for a total worth of $6.02M. Following the transaction, his holdings stood at 359,137 shares. Intel ( INTC ) disclosed that EVP and CFO David Zinsner purchased 5,882 shares at an average price of $42.50 per share, for a total investment of $249,985. Following the purchase, he held 247,392 shares. Robert Ford, chairman and CEO of Abbott Laboratories ( ABT ), acquired 18,800 shares at an average price of $107.13 per share, amounting to $2.01M. His total holdings increased to 469,508 shares. GameStop ( GME ) Director Lawrence Cheng bought 5,000 shares at an average price of $22.87 per share, representing a total purchase value of $114,368. He now holds 88,000 shares. Internation...

Insider trades: Merck, Intel, Micron among notable names Seeking Alpha

Amazon stock (AMZN) slides on $200 billion AI capex plan — what Wall Street watches next week TechStock²

Specializing in network testing and optical security, this tech firm reported a notable insider sale amid a year of strong stock gains. Oleg Khaykin, President & CEO of Viavi Solutions (VIAV +4.23%), sold 70,566 directly-held shares in open-market transactions on Feb. 6, 2026, for a total consideration of approximately $1.9 million according to the SEC Form 4 filing. Transaction summary Metric Value Shares sold (direct) 70,566 Transaction value ~$1.9 million Post-transaction shares (direct) 1,708,871 Post-transaction shares (indirect) 40,238 Post-transaction value (direct ownership) ~$45.1 million Transaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average purchase price ($26.27); post-transaction value based on Feb. 6, 2026 market close ($26.38). Key questions How significant is this sale relative to Mr. Khaykin's historical trading patterns? The 70,566 shares sold align closely with Mr. Khaykin's median sale size of 72,004 shares over the past year, suggesting the transaction is consistent with recent activity rather than an outlier in scale. The 70,566 shares sold align closely with Mr. Khaykin's median sale size of 72,004 shares over the past year, suggesting the transaction is consistent with recent activity rather than an outlier in scale. What is the impact on Mr. Khaykin's ownership and how much capacity remains? After this transaction, Mr. Khaykin retains 1,708,871 directly-held shares and 40,238 shares indirectly (through his spouse), equating to a remaining direct stake valued at approximately $45.1 million as of Feb. 6, 2026, and representing 76.6% of the holdings he held at the start of the period analyzed. After this transaction, Mr. Khaykin retains 1,708,871 directly-held shares and 40,238 shares indirectly (through his spouse), equating to a remaining direct stake valued at approximately $45.1 million as of Feb. 6, 2026, and representing 76.6% of the holdings he held at the start of the period analyzed. Were any derivative, indirect, or administrative tra...

Dougal Waters/DigitalVision via Getty Images Axon Enterprise ( AXON ) is becoming a successful provider of utility-like SaaS infrastructure to government customers. That very success, however, may be altering the nature of the business in ways that investors - and the market - are just now waking up to. First, Axon used to sell TASERS - it was a product vendor. Then it became a platform - it sold devices and related software. Now, with its 911 move, it is becoming a digital infrastructure provider for the government. Such companies have high customer retention and strong revenue visibility. What is less visible, though, is that this move from software+device to regulated infrastructure can compress valuation multiples. Why? Because during this phase, it takes longer and longer to monetize assets, and there’s an increasing need for reinvestments into the business. Axon may be entering that phase. A few early indications tell me that this is already happening. In November, Axon reported strong revenue growth but missed earnings expectations. Why? Because they fueled a lot of money back into the business, and that caused significant margin reduction. Around the same period, the stock saw a sharp ~30% decline from recent highs, even though, operationally, there was nothing wrong with the company. Ergo, the company is a victim of its own success. Rationale for short term price movements are difficult to pin down. However, the significant gap between business performance and equity performance could well be because investors are starting to reassess Axon’s business itself - not its performance. In its most recently reported quarter , Axon generated strong revenues of ~$710.6 million. However, it missed its earnings consensus. This tension between revenue and earnings forces me to ask: should Axon be valued as a stable but boring public-sector infrastructure provider? Axon Is Becoming Public-Sector Digital Infrastructure Axon is itself increasingly describing its business ...

格隆汇2月8日｜美国总统特朗普称，促成像Nexstar-Tegna这样的良性交易，将有助于打击假新闻。

格隆汇2月8日｜元宝通过在口令内容上方增设符号，目前该红包口令可在微信平台复制，用户可复制至元宝APP参与新春活动；而千问的春节活动分享口令，截至目前仍无法在微信平台完成复制。

The global publishing platform Substack is generating revenue from newsletters that promote virulent Nazi ideology, white supremacy and antisemitism, a Guardian investigation has found. The platform, which says it has about 50 million users worldwide, allows members of the public to self-publish articles and charge for premium content. Substack takes about 10% of the revenue the newsletters make. About 5 million people pay for access to newsletters on its platform. Among them are newsletters that openly promote racist ideology. One, called NatSocToday, which has 2,800 subscribers, charges $80 – about £60 – for an annual subscription, though most of its posts are available for free. NatSocToday is understood to be run by a far-right activist based in the US and features a swastika, a symbol appropriated by the Nazi party in the 1920s to symbolise white supremacy, as its profile picture. The full name of the Nazi party was the National Socialist German Workers’ party. One of its recent posts suggests the Jewish race was responsible for the second world war and describes Adolf Hitler as “one of the greatest men of all time”. Within two hours of subscribing to NatSocToday for the purposes of this investigation, the Substack algorithm directed the Guardian’s account to 21 other profiles featuring similar content. Some of these accounts regularly share and like each other’s posts. Many have thousands of followers. Erika Drexler, a self-styled “NS [national socialist] activist” with 241 subscribers, shared posts describing Hitler as her hero and the “most overqualified leader ever”. The account is also believed to be US-based and charges $150 for an annual subscription. Ava Wolfe, who has 3,000 subscribers and calls herself an “archivist of articles and videos about history in particular WW2” appears to be based in the UK. She has a profile which features swastikas and other Nazi imagery. An annual subscription to her Substack costs £38. Much of the content Wolfe posts eng...

Key Points VYM charges a much lower expense ratio and has a higher trailing one-year return than NOBL. NOBL concentrates on dividend growth stocks and tilts toward industrials and consumer defensives, while VYM is heavier in financials and technology. Both funds are highly liquid, but VYM's larger assets under management and broader holdings may appeal to investors seeking diversification. 10 stocks we like better than ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF › The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEMKT:VYM) stands out for its low cost, higher trailing return, and broader sector exposure, while the ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NYSEMKT:NOBL) targets dividend growth with a focus on industrials and consumer defensives. Both VYM and NOBL are popular choices for income-focused investors, but their approaches differ. VYM aims for high current yield from a wide swath of U.S. stocks. This comparison explores key differences in cost, returns, risk, and portfolio composition. Snapshot (cost & size) Metric VYM NOBL Issuer Vanguard ProShares Expense ratio 0.06% 0.35% 1-yr return (as of 2026-01-30) 12.7% 6.6% Dividend yield 2.3% 2.0% Beta 0.76 0.83 AUM $84.6 billion $11.5 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. VYM is significantly more affordable with a 0.06% expense ratio compared to NOBL's 0.35%, and it also offers a slightly higher dividend yield. Performance & risk comparison Metric VYM NOBL Max drawdown (5 y) -15.83% -17.92% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,636 $1,396 What's inside NOBL tracks U.S. companies in the S&P 500 that have raised dividends for at least 25 consecutive years, resulting in a focused portfolio of 70 stocks. Industrials (24%) and consumer defensive (21%) sectors dominate, and the fund’s top holdings — Sysco Corp. (NYSE:SYY), C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (NASDAQ:CHRW), and Colgate-Palmolive...

American Express' (NYSE: AXP) stock has rallied nearly 60% over the past three years as the S&P 500 advanced just over 20%. The financial services giant outperformed the market as it continued generating stable growth in a tough macro environment. But will this blue chip stalwart stay ahead of the market over the next three years? Let's review its business model, growth rates, and valuations to decide. How American Express differs from Visa and Mastercard American Express controls a much smaller slice of the global card processing market than Visa and Mastercard, but it operates a different business model. Visa and Mastercard only operate payment processing networks and don't issue any cards. Banks and other financial institutions issue co-branded cards with Visa and Mastercard, take on the customers' debt, and pay the two companies "swipe fees" for accessing their payment networks. American Express is both a payment processor and a card issuer. It's one of the largest banks in America by total assets and backs its cards with its own balance sheet. That's why it's much harder to get an American Express card than a co-branded Visa or Mastercard. Amex's prioritization of high credit scores makes its cards status symbols of financial success, but it also limits its own customer base. As a result, many businesses -- especially overseas ones -- still don't accept Amex cards. How did American Express fare over the past three years? American Express suffered a major slowdown in 2021 as the pandemic throttled consumer spending throughout most of the year. But its business quickly recovered over the following two years as those headwinds dissipated. It also consistently reduced its number of outstanding shares throughout that choppy slowdown and recovery. Metric 2021 2022 2023 Total revenue (net of interest expense) growth (17%) 17% 14% Diluted EPS growth (53%) 166% 14% Change in outstanding shares (3%) (2%) (2%) For 2024, it expects its revenue to rise 9% to 11% as its EPS ...

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky says the US is proposing to finish all necessary negotiations to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in June. “The Americans are proposing that the parties end the war by the beginning of this summer,” Zelensky told reporters in a briefing late on Friday. “We understand that American internal issues have an impact and will certainly become even more relevant for them,” he said, suggesting US midterm elections in November would become the administration’s major focus. Advertisement Zelensky said that the next round of peace talks aimed at ending Russia’s four-year invasion may happen in about a week, amid another proposed energy truce. “The Ukrainian team has already accepted the invitation,” he said. Washington has once again advised Ukraine and Russia to halt strikes on energy targets as a “de-escalation gesture”, which Ukraine has accepted, he said. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky chairs a meeting with journalists at his office in Kyiv on Friday. Photo: Ukrainian Presidential Press Service via AFP Hours after Zelensky’s comments, Russian forces unleashed another massive missile and drone barrage, targeting Ukraine’s power grid and leaving much of the nation’s west without electricity, heating or water.

"These actions of unprecedented seriousness do not in any way tarnish Italy's image in the world, an image that the Games will make even more compelling and positive," said Deputy Prime Minister and Transport Minister Matteo Salvini.

We came across a bullish thesis on CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. on Potential Multibaggers’s Substack by Kris. In this article, we will summarize the bulls’ thesis on CRWD. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.'s share was trading at $469.19 as of January 28th. CRWD’s trailing and forward P/E were 401.83 and 98.04, respectively according to Yahoo Finance. Why Needham Backed Allot in November After a Decade-High Profit Quarter Den Rise/Shutterstock.com CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cybersecurity solutions in the United States and internationally. CRWD’s competitive advantage is increasingly evident as cybersecurity enters an AI-driven, agentic era, a shift clearly articulated at its Fal.Con event. The company has built its Falcon platform as a single-agent, cloud-native solution in an otherwise fragmented industry dominated by legacy, point-product vendors. This consolidation strategy is not merely about cost savings but about delivering a unified security “circle” that expands with customer needs. Large enterprises such as Gap and Oracle illustrate this dynamic, with deep module adoption driving materially higher ARR at renewal and demonstrating strong lifetime value relative to customer acquisition cost. CrowdStrike’s vision extends beyond automation toward fully autonomous security operations, with CEO George Kurtz framing the journey as moving from assisted human analysts to level-five autonomy. This ambition is underpinned by a formidable data moat, built from trillions of security events, millions of labeled annotations, and hundreds of incident response engagements each year. As AI models increasingly depend on high-quality, real-world data, this advantage compounds. Strategic tuck-in acquisitions such as Onum and Pangea further strengthen the Falcon platform, enabling CrowdStrike to be first to market with a comprehensive AI Detection and Response (AIDR) solution that will be essential as enterprises deploy AI agents at scale. The company is also redefining identity ...

We came across a bullish thesis on Wix.com Ltd. on i'm stf’s Substack by stf. In this article, we will summarize the bulls’ thesis on WIX. Wix.com Ltd.'s share was trading at $93.04 as of January 28th. WIX’s trailing and forward P/E were 37.27 and 12.72 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. Lumentum (LITE0 Climbs 9.6%, Mirrors Broader Market Rally Copyright: melpomen / 123RF Stock Photo Wix.com Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, operates a cloud-based web development platform for registered users and creators worldwide. WIX is viewed as undervalued following its June 2025 acquisition of Base44, with the market seemingly focused on fears of AI-driven disruption and competition from Google while overlooking the potential for meaningful ARR re-acceleration. Recent share price weakness appears to discount the risk of “AI replacement” but fails to reflect the opportunity created by embedding Base44’s “vibe-coding” capabilities across Wix’s 270M+ registered user base. Wix operates a freemium SaaS model anchored by its DIY website builder, which remains the core cash-flow engine through premium subscriptions, while its Wix Studio platform has successfully moved the company upmarket by serving professional creators, agencies, and enterprises at higher ARPU levels. The Base44 acquisition, completed for approximately $80 million, introduces conversational AI-driven development that allows users to build websites and applications through natural language prompts rather than drag-and-drop tools or traditional code. Rather than a standalone product, Base44 is best understood as a feature layer that can be integrated across Wix’s ecosystem. This technology significantly expands Wix’s total addressable market by attracting non-technical users who want to create tools or apps, not just websites, while also providing a compelling new upsell lever for its largely free user base. Base44 can also be packaged into premium AI-driven tiers, driving ARPU expansion and allowing Wix to...

Social media is on trial in Los Angeles. What happens next could change the way they operate. Inside LA's superior court, a landmark trial is getting under way. Social media companies are being accused of being addictive by design, a bit like tobacco and cigarettes were in the 1980s. They'll face around 22 "bellwether" lawsuits, i.e. test cases, with lawyers considering the testimonies of more than 1,500 people when launching the action. Opening statements for the first lawsuit will start on Monday, with Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg among the tech execs expected to testify. Over the years, people have tried to sue the owners of Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and Snapchat for online harm, but they've largely failed. Often, social media companies will rely on a defence called Section 230 of America's Communications Act, which protects online platforms publishing third-party content. It says they're not responsible for content posted by users on their platforms. So what makes this court case so different? For the first time, social media companies will face a trial by jury. Those jurors won't decide whether specific content on the platforms was harmful. Instead, they'll decide whether social media companies were negligent when they created and tweaked their products to encourage people to spend more time on them. Read more science and technology news: Autism rates between girls and boys challenged by new study The new Anthropic AI model scaring lawyers and legal firms Elon Musk's xAI chatbot Grok faces ICO probe A feature expected to come up, for example, is "infinite scrolling", whereby your social media feed never ends, no matter how long you spend watching it. The plaintiffs allege that Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and Snapchat "have rewired how our kids think, feel, and behave", according to the class action master complaint. If the jurors decide the companies were negligent when creating their products, they'll then also need to decide whethe...

Disney (NYSE: DIS) recently announced that current head of the theme parks and cruise line will take over the CEO role from Bob Iger, who is now set to retire at the end of 2026. In this video, longtime Disney fans Matt Frankel and Rick Munarriz discuss whether Disney is in a better position now than when Iger decided to come out of retirement a couple of years ago. *Stock prices used were the morning prices of Feb. 3, 2026. The video was published on Feb.4, 2026. Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue » Should you buy stock in Walt Disney right now? Before you buy stock in Walt Disney, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Walt Disney wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $443,299!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,136,601!* Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 914% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 195% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of February 7, 2026. Matt Frankel, CFP has positions in Walt Disney. Rick Munarriz has positions in Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Matthew Frankel is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through their...

On Friday Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk issued a stark warning regarding the U.S. national debt, stating that America is on a path to bankruptcy. Musk emphasized the necessity of advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics to avert this financial crisis. In a recent podcast appearance, Musk declared, "We are 1,000% going to go bankrupt as a country and fail as a country, without AI and robots. The national debt is piling up like crazy." He underscored that without these technological breakthroughs, the national debt issue is insurmountable. Elon Musk’s Dire Warning For America The U.S. national debt currently stands at $38.56 trillion, with federal spending surpassing revenue significantly. In the fiscal year 2026 alone, the government has spent approximately $602 billion more than it has collected. Musk highlighted the growing burden of servicing this debt, noting, "The interest payments on national debt exceed the military budget, which is a trillion dollars." This financial strain is projected to worsen, with a report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget predicting interest payments on the national debt will exceed $1.5 trillion by 2032 and reach $1.8 trillion by 2035. How National Debt Threatens Economic Stability Musk’s warnings extend to the potential devaluation of the dollar, a concern he has voiced previously. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, the purchasing power of $100 in 2025 is equivalent to just $12.06 in 1970, illustrating significant erosion over time. The implications of a devalued dollar and escalating debt servicing costs could have profound impacts on the U.S. economy, necessitating urgent attention and innovative solutions. Investors’ Strategies Amid Fiscal Uncertainty Despite the grim outlook, Musk’s comments suggest that investors can still find opportunities to safeguard their wealth. Historically, savvy investors have navigated fiscal challenges by adapting their strategies to protect against ...