Key Points Investors have been worried for years about the prospects for Warren Buffett to stop leading Berkshire Hathaway. Now that the moment has come, though, Buffett has expressed a huge amount of confidence in Abel. Investors might appreciate Berkshire’s lack of correlation to the broader market. 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway › Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B) has a track record of excellence that's hard for any other stock to match. A big part of Berkshire's success has come as a result of its legendary leader, Warren Buffett, who just stepped down as CEO at the end of 2025. With decades of market outperformance under Buffett's belt, successor CEO Greg Abel has his work cut out for him to build on his predecessor's legacy. Today, this three-part series on Berkshire Hathaway for the Voyager Portfolio concludes with a closer look at the CEO succession from Buffett to Abel and what investors can expect. And although I won't be adding Berkshire Hathaway stock to this portfolio, that doesn't mean that you shouldn't strongly consider it as a complement to the other individual stock holdings you may own. Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue » The inevitable passing of the baton Given Buffett's incredible tenure at Berkshire, succession has been in the forefront of shareholders' minds for a long time. For years, Buffett and former vice-chair Charlie Munger reassured Berkshire stock investors by stating that there was a plan in place without providing specifics. Then, in 2021, Berkshire announced that its board of directors had unanimously supported Abel to be Buffett's designated successor. After that, Buffett said encouraging things about Abel's prowess on multiple occasions. Buffett is on record saying he'd rather have Abel managing his finances than any o...

阿拉格齊：若美軍攻打伊朗 德黑蘭將反擊中東美軍基地 To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 【有線新聞】伊朗外長阿拉格齊表示很快會與美國舉行新一輪會談，又強調鈾濃縮是伊朗不可剝奪的權利。 阿拉格齊接受半島電視台訪問指伊朗不會放棄鈾濃縮，亦不會就導彈議題談判，指伊朗核問題只能透過談判解決，雙方已同意盡快舉行新一輪會談，但具體日期及會談地點仍未確定。他又警告如果集結在中東地區的美軍攻打伊朗，德黑蘭將攻擊美軍在中東的軍事基地。

日本眾議院選舉｜投票今開始 料最快凌晨公布結果 To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 【有線新聞】日本眾議院選舉開始投票。 全國4萬4千多個票站早上7時開放至晚上8時，之後開始點票，預計最快凌晨公布選舉結果。選前民調顯示，先前兩次大選失利的自民黨有望捲土重來，在總裁高市早苗領導下單獨取得過半數議席，更有機會和執政盟友日本維新會達到絕對多數。

Key Points SCHD trades with a slightly higher expense ratio but offers more than double the dividend yield of VIG VIG has outperformed SCHD on both 1-year returns and 5-year growth, but SCHD has experienced a shallower recent drawdown SCHD leans into energy and consumer defensive stocks, while VIG concentrates on technology and financials 10 stocks we like better than Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF › Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT:VIG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHD) stand out for their low costs and focus on dividend growth, but SCHD’s yield more than doubles VIG’s, while VIG has delivered stronger recent returns and heavier tech exposure. Both funds aim to provide diversified exposure to U.S. companies with robust dividend track records, but their strategies and sector bets differ. This comparison unpacks how VIG and SCHD stack up on cost, yield, performance, risk, and portfolio construction to help investors pinpoint the best fit for their income and growth goals. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric VIG SCHD Issuer Vanguard Schwab Expense ratio 0.05% 0.06% 1-yr return (as of Jan. 30, 2026) 10.4% 6.6% Dividend yield 1.6% 3.5% Beta 0.85 0.77 AUM $103.1 billion $77.3 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. SCHD carries a marginally higher expense ratio than VIG, but the difference is only 0.01 percentage points—practically negligible for most investors. Where SCHD stands out is its much higher dividend yield, offering a substantially larger payout than VIG. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric VIG SCHD Max drawdown (5 y) -20.39% -16.86% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,617 $1,393 What's Inside SCHD tracks 101 U.S. companies screened for dividend strength and quality, with the fund now over 14 years old. Its biggest sector allocations are energy (19%), consumer defensive (18%), and healthcare (18%). ...

【有線新聞】日本眾議院選舉開始投票，選前民調顯示，先前兩次大選失利的自民黨有望捲土重來，在總裁高市早苗領導下單獨取得過半數議席，更有機會和執政盟友日本維新會達到絕對多數。 今次日本眾議院選舉只有12天拉票是歷來最短，首相高市早苗亦不敢怠慢，馬不停蹄為自民黨的候選人站台。高市早苗：「當前的政治形勢停滯不前，只試圖維持現狀，如果放手不管，就真的不會出現曙光，我想把眼前和未來的不安轉化為希望。」 高市上台3個多月就因為「台灣有事」言論觸怒北京當局，為日本經濟帶來潛在危機，但她提出改行積極財政政策，獲民眾寄予厚望，其內閣支持率達6成3。雖然因解散眾議院提前大選爭議，比上台初期下跌數個百分點，但仍有望帶領自民黨走出在去年參議院和前年眾議院選舉議席大減的陰霾。 眾議院465席中，由單議席選區產生的有289席，其餘176席由比例代表制產生。按民調推算，自民黨如果能夠吸納游離選民，在眾議院的議席有望由現時不過半的198席大幅增至約250席，遠多於眾院233席的過半數門檻。加上日本維新會的議席，執政聯盟有可能取得達到絕對多數所需的261席。 至於主要對手立憲民主黨和公明黨合組的中道改革聯合，被外界認為選舉策略未能團結反高市選民而陷於苦戰，議席可能由現時172席大減至約110席。 民調又發現逾四成選民最關心的選舉議題是高物價對策，其次才是社會福利和外交安保政策。

Key Points IEFA costs slightly less than IEMG and offers a higher dividend yield IEMG delivered a stronger 1-year return and experienced a steeper maximum drawdown, but IEFA had higher 5-year returns. IEFA focuses on developed markets, while IEMG targets emerging markets with a tech and financial tilt 10 stocks we like better than iShares Trust - iShares Core Msci Eafe ETF › While both the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEMKT:IEMG) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (NYSEMKT:IEFA) offer broad international equity exposure at low cost, IEFA trades at a marginally lower expense ratio and yields more, whereas IEMG has outperformed over the past year and covers riskier, higher-growth emerging markets. IEMG and IEFA are both core international ETFs from iShares, but they track different global slices: IEMG focuses on emerging markets, while IEFA excludes the U.S. and Canada, and emerging economies, instead targeting developed markets in Europe, Asia, and Australia. This comparison highlights where each fund stands on cost, performance, risk, portfolio makeup, and trading ease. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric IEMG IEFA Issuer IShares IShares Expense ratio 0.09% 0.07% 1-yr return (as of 2026-01-30) 35.3% 26.6% Dividend yield 2.5% 3.4% Beta 0.65 0.85 AUM $141.4 billion $174.1 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. IEFA looks a bit more affordable with its 0.07% fee compared to IEMG’s 0.09%, and it also pays a higher dividend yield by nearly a full percentage point, which may appeal to income-focused investors. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric IEMG IEFA Max drawdown (5 y) -37.16% -30.41% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,106 $1,353 What's Inside IEFA holds about 2,589 developed-market stocks across Europe, Asia, and Australia, with its largest sector weights in financial services (22%), industrials (20%), and healthcare (11%)...

She said his lawyers had set up a company, Prytanee LLC, based in the US Virgin Islands. Mediapart said Caroline Lang had received half of the shares, but she said she had not invested in it or received any funds from it.

Key Points CEO Oleg Khaykin sold 70,566 shares for a transaction value of ~$1.9 million on Feb. 6, 2026. This disposition represented 3.88% of Mr. Khaykin's aggregate holdings. No indirect, derivative, or administrative transactions were reported; all activity was direct and open-market. The transaction size closely matches Mr. Khaykin's median sale over the past year, reflecting stable sale cadence amid a 106.1% one-year stock price gain. 10 stocks we like better than Viavi Solutions › Oleg Khaykin, President & CEO of Viavi Solutions (NASDAQ:VIAV), sold 70,566 directly-held shares in open-market transactions on Feb. 6, 2026, for a total consideration of approximately $1.9 million according to the SEC Form 4 filing. Transaction summary Metric Value Shares sold (direct) 70,566 Transaction value ~$1.9 million Post-transaction shares (direct) 1,708,871 Post-transaction shares (indirect) 40,238 Post-transaction value (direct ownership) ~$45.1 million Transaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average purchase price ($26.27); post-transaction value based on Feb. 6, 2026 market close ($26.38). Key questions How significant is this sale relative to Mr. Khaykin's historical trading patterns? The 70,566 shares sold align closely with Mr. Khaykin's median sale size of 72,004 shares over the past year, suggesting the transaction is consistent with recent activity rather than an outlier in scale. The 70,566 shares sold align closely with Mr. Khaykin's median sale size of 72,004 shares over the past year, suggesting the transaction is consistent with recent activity rather than an outlier in scale. What is the impact on Mr. Khaykin's ownership and how much capacity remains? After this transaction, Mr. Khaykin retains 1,708,871 directly-held shares and 40,238 shares indirectly (through his spouse), equating to a remaining direct stake valued at approximately $45.1 million as of Feb. 6, 2026, and representing 76.6% of the holdings he held at the start of the period analyzed. A...

Francesca Lollobrigida celebrates with her young son after winning Italy's first gold medal at this year's Winter Olympics in the women's 3,000m speed skating.

Kiev Left With Few Hours Of Power Per Day In Subzero Temps Ukraine and Russia have just wrapped up a second round of US-mediated negotiations in Abu Dhabi, but overnight Ukrainian cities were hit with another massive aerial attack on the national power grid. "Russia is carrying out another massive attack on the Ukrainian power grid facilities," grid operator Ukrenergo said on Saturday. "Due to the damage caused by the enemy, emergency outages have been applied in most regions ." via AFP Ukrenergo said in its Telegram statement, "Currently, the attack is still ongoing. Restoration work will begin as soon as the security situation allows." Dozens of missiles and hundreds of drones were unleashed, in what has become an almost nightly reality. Already rolling emergency blackouts have impacted towns and cities across Ukraine, but this fresh assault resulted in more blackouts. According to some specifics in the NY Times : The overnight strikes hit high-voltage transmission lines that are used to transmit electricity nationwide and that form the backbone of Ukraine’s power grid, as well as power plants and substations, said Denys Shmyhal, the country’s energy minister. The damage prompted Kyiv to request emergency electricity assistance from Poland, Mr. Shmyhal said on social media . The strikes were the latest in a series of Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure during a winter freeze. Mr. Shmyhal said the bombardment on Saturday had forced operators at nuclear power plants to “unload” reactor units , meaning that workers reduced power output or shut down reactors as a precautionary measure when external electricity supplies became unstable. Supplies were already in a dire situation after the even larger Feb. 3rd Russian attack on the energy grid. At this point the capital area is expected to receive only four to six hours of electricity per day in February. Some residents are without heat and water, amid dangerously frigid temperatures, which in recent days ...

Is AMD's 17% decline a warning for Nvidia shareholders ahead of Feb. 25? MSN

It would be easy to paint this as a Cole Palmer masterclass, the Chelsea midfielder completing his hat-trick inside the opening 38 minutes, but it is fair to say by the time he was substituted on the hour, his work was done. At that point it was 3-1 to the visitors, Wolves pulling a goal back early in the second half when Tolu Arokodare spun in the box to convert at a corner. From there, if not earlier, it was hard not to feel as though Chelsea were going through the motions. Palmer’s trio of cool finishes, two from the penalty spot, earned victory and his third, capping a slick team move, was surely the most pleasing for Liam Rosenior. Rosenior’s record as Chelsea head coach now reads seven wins in nine matches and four successive victories in the Premier League. With fourth-placed Manchester United finding their groove under Michael Carrick and registering a fourth straight league win themselves, Chelsea, a point and a place behind them, knew the importance of keeping pace. Wolves must be sick of the sight of Chelsea, even if there was a slightly different look to the side that won the reverse fixture 3-0 at Stamford Bridge in November. Palmer, of course, was the obvious absentee there and it was the same story when a youthful Chelsea side won here 4-3 in the Carabao Cup. Wolves have now lost their past four matches to Chelsea by an aggregate scoreline of 15-4 and that is without mentioning their 6-2 defeat at the start of last season. Wolves began the better side but they crumbled after Matt Doherty, their captain, gave away a silly penalty. João Pedro was moseying away from José Sá’s goal but Doherty was overzealous and gave the Brazil forward a bump in the box that gave the referee, Jarred Gillett, little choice but to point to the penalty spot. Palmer sent Sá the wrong way and covered his ears with his black gloves as he wheeled away towards the Chelsea supporters strewn across the lower bank of the Steve Bull Stand. Pedro Neto, who caused havoc for Hugo Bueno...

AMD Rallied 8% on AI Chip Bets: Why the Stock Could Reach $700 in 2026 TIKR.com

Last November, I published an article admitting I got Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) “epically wrong.” Since its March 2024 IPO, I had been skeptical about the company’s prospects, with my main concerns centering on user metrics and its ad business as a core growth driver. Content licensing deals with AI companies, such as the $60 million annual ... Maybe I Wasn’t So Wrong About Reddit After All

Key events 46m ago Team news 48m ago Preamble Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature 6m ago 17.16 GMT Newcastle still have a formidable home record this season. Before the 2-0 defeat by Aston Villa a fortnight ago, they’d not actually been toppled at St James’s Park in the Premier League since Arsenal beat them 2-1 in September. The FA Cup penalty shootout defeat to Bournemouth and the Carabao Cup shellacking by Manchester City have obviously dented the confidence somewhat, but on their home patch Eddie Howe’s side are strong. Share 12m ago 17.10 GMT It’s around about this time that I ask you for your score predictions – send them to me via email if you wish. I shall also remind you that the last three games I’ve live-blogged for the Guardian have brought four goals – two 3-1 home wins and a 2-2 draw. So I’m predicting a 3-1 Newcastle win to continue the trend. Wissa would just love a goal, wouldn’t he? And it’s about time Howe’s boys got back on track at home. Share 25m ago 16.57 GMT The results in the earlier games mean Brentford can still go level on points with sixth-placed Liverpool with a win on Tyneside. Newcastle will jump into the top half if they claim the three points. Fulham and Sunderland losing will give cheer to these two teams for a few reasons. The middle of the Premier League table is a very fluid situation this season. Share 39m ago 16.43 GMT It is an almighty boost for Newcastle to have Guimarães back in their midfield. They’re just a different team without him. The only downside for Eddie Howe this evening is Anthony Gordon’s absence – the winger hasn’t recovered from a hamstring injury in time to feature. It’ll be a particularly big night for Yoane Wissa, who is again preferred to Nick Woltemade up front for Newcastle. Wissa was injured for the Magpies’ 3-1 defeat at his former club Brentford earlier in the season. Igor Thiago has fared pretty well as Wissa’s de facto replacement this season and the Brazilian – who h...

Explore how QLD’s tech-heavy approach stacks up against SSO’s broader diversification for leveraged ETF investors. ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD +4.16%) stands out for its deeper tech focus, higher recent returns, and steeper drawdowns compared to ProShares - Ultra S&P500 (SSO +3.87%), while also carrying a marginally higher fee and lower yield. This comparison lines up two leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from ProShares, each aiming to deliver two times the daily performance of a major U.S. equity index: SSO tracks the S&P 500, while QLD targets the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100. Both are designed for tactical traders seeking amplified exposure, but their index choices lead to meaningful differences in risk and return. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric SSO QLD Issuer ProShares ProShares Expense ratio 0.87% 0.95% 1-yr return (as of 2026-01-30) 21.0% 27.6% Dividend yield 0.6% 0.2% Beta 2.01 2.31 AUM $7.8 billion $10.7 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. QLD charges a slightly higher fee than SSO, making SSO more affordable for cost-sensitive traders, while QLD’s yield is notably lower, offering less in the way of income for those who value payouts. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric SSO QLD Max drawdown (5 y) -46.77% -63.78% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,573 $2,370 What's Inside QLD seeks to double the daily returns of the Nasdaq-100, resulting in a portfolio that is highly concentrated in technology (53%), with additional weightings in communication services (17%) and consumer cyclical stocks (13%). Its top holdings—Nvidia Corp (NVDA +8.01%), Apple Inc (AAPL +0.87%), and Microsoft Corp (MSFT +1.90%)—comprise a sizable portion of assets, and the fund holds 121 positions. QLD has been operating for nearly 20 years and, like SSO, features a daily leverage reset, which can cause performance to diverge from the index over longer h...

With Greg Abel now at the helm, some investors are nervous about the company Warren Buffett built. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A +0.74%) (BRK.B +0.80%) has a track record of excellence that's hard for any other stock to match. A big part of Berkshire's success has come as a result of its legendary leader, Warren Buffett, who just stepped down as CEO at the end of 2025. With decades of market outperformance under Buffett's belt, successor CEO Greg Abel has his work cut out for him to build on his predecessor's legacy. Today, this three-part series on Berkshire Hathaway for the Voyager Portfolio concludes with a closer look at the CEO succession from Buffett to Abel and what investors can expect. And although I won't be adding Berkshire Hathaway stock to this portfolio, that doesn't mean that you shouldn't strongly consider it as a complement to the other individual stock holdings you may own. The inevitable passing of the baton Given Buffett's incredible tenure at Berkshire, succession has been in the forefront of shareholders' minds for a long time. For years, Buffett and former vice-chair Charlie Munger reassured Berkshire stock investors by stating that there was a plan in place without providing specifics. Then, in 2021, Berkshire announced that its board of directors had unanimously supported Abel to be Buffett's designated successor. After that, Buffett said encouraging things about Abel's prowess on multiple occasions. Buffett is on record saying he'd rather have Abel managing his finances than any of a host of other corporate leaders or investment advisors. He even said that Abel has better management skills than he does, highlighting the important need for any Berkshire CEO to manage the conglomerate's subsidiaries adeptly while still leaving day-to-day operational decisions to respective leaders at each subsidiary. That's been a key ingredient in Berkshire's past success. Setting Abel up for success Perhaps the most valuable thing that Berkshire and Buffett did...

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has minimal fees and offers investors an easy way to track the market. Investing in the stock market doesn't have to be complicated. By simply tracking the S&P 500 (^GSPC +1.97%), which is an index of the largest companies in the U.S., you can be confident that your portfolio will rise in value over the long term. While there will be bumps and bad years along the way, the index has continually recovered and grown in value. There are many exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the index, and they can make for solid long-term investments. What's key, however, is to focus on low-cost funds. These types of investments will ensure that fees aren't putting a big dent into your overall returns. One of the best low-cost funds to buy today is the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO +1.95%). Minimizing fees should be a priority for long-term investors One of the most appealing features of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is its efficiency. At 0.03%, it's hard to find a lower expense ratio than what this ETF charges. That means if you were to invest $10,000 into this fund, you'd be incurring fees totaling just $3 per year. As your balance increases, your fees will also rise -- but they will still be fairly minimal. Over time, fees can add up, and even a single percentage point difference in your portfolio's performance can have a significant impact. Consider if the S&P 500 were to rise by around 10% per year, which is what it has averaged historically, for 30 years. A $50,000 investment would grow to be worth around $872,000. But if your return averaged a percentage point lower, at around 9%, then your investment would be worth approximately $663,000 -- a difference of nearly $210,000. This is why paying attention to fees is crucial for long-term investors, as ignoring them could result in significantly worse returns. Expand NYSEMKT : VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Today's Change ( 1.95 %) $ 12.14 Current Price $ 635.24 Key Data Points Day's Range $ 626.20 - $ 636.72 52wk Ra...

There are times when the best thing for a side is an uneventful win. Titles are won less in the big set-piece games than against mid-table sides in the easily forgotten circumstances of a Saturday afternoon. Arsenal weren’t brilliant against Sunderland, but they were good enough to win comfortably, and that increases their lead at the top of the table to nine points, adding a degree of extra pressure to Manchester City’s Sunday visit to Liverpool. In a way, this was the platonic ideal of Mikel Arteta’s football. Not a huge amount happened but most of what did was in or around the Sunderland box. It was bitty, stop-start, built around set-plays and devoid of much in the way of imagination or spontaneity. Coaches obsessed by pressing patterns probably loved it, but it will not live long in the wider collective memory. For a long time the game seemed in danger of being mutually respected out of existence, both teams watching, probing warily, even if in the end Arsenal’s probing proved far more dangerous. Continue reading...

For Burnley this felt like the beginning of their Premier League farewell tour, while West Ham reignited their fight for survival. In truth, there was little between the two but the Hammers showed why they have hope of staying up, providing the brief moments of quality, something the Lancastrians could not. Crysencio Summerville and Taty Castellanos expertly finished from two perfect assists to send West Ham to victory, leaving them three points adrift of 17th-placed Nottingham Forest, the place above the relegation spots. Burnley showed fight in the second half but a 16th straight game without a win, including 11 defeats, brought derision from the home supporters and demands for change in the dugout and boardroom. There was more than an air of resignation around Turf Moor before the first whistle was blown. Nothing in the opening 12 minutes suggested either team had the desire or capability to get out of the relegation zone as the game began at a pedestrian pace. Burnley, as Scott Parker puts it, are often on the wrong side of the Premier League’s “fine margins” but it is often of their own making. On this occasion, Lucas Pires gave the ball away needlessly on the halfway line, Mateus Fernandes broke and slipped a precise pass through to Summerville, who reminded Kyle Walker of his advancing years, before dinking over Martin Dúbravka. Neither fans are happy with life but the visitors were more vocal, chanting “sack the board” in the hope of ousting Karren Brady and David Sullivan, though Burnley supporters were not short of toxicity come the 26th minute. The second was far too easy as El Hadji Malick Diouf was afforded the left wing to himself, allowing him to send in a perfect cross, headed home by Castellanos, who did well to get across his man. Boos rang out at Turf Moor, in the knowledge getting back into the match was nigh-on impossible for Burnley. At least when in a difficult situation at the turn of the year, West Ham acted in the market to bring new player...

Explore how sector focus and dividend strategy set these two leading ETFs apart for investors seeking income or growth. Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG +2.19%) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD +1.61%) stand out for their low costs and focus on dividend growth, but SCHD’s yield more than doubles VIG’s, while VIG has delivered stronger recent returns and heavier tech exposure. Both funds aim to provide diversified exposure to U.S. companies with robust dividend track records, but their strategies and sector bets differ. This comparison unpacks how VIG and SCHD stack up on cost, yield, performance, risk, and portfolio construction to help investors pinpoint the best fit for their income and growth goals. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric VIG SCHD Issuer Vanguard Schwab Expense ratio 0.05% 0.06% 1-yr return (as of Jan. 30, 2026) 10.4% 6.6% Dividend yield 1.6% 3.5% Beta 0.85 0.77 AUM $103.1 billion $77.3 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. SCHD carries a marginally higher expense ratio than VIG, but the difference is only 0.01 percentage points—practically negligible for most investors. Where SCHD stands out is its much higher dividend yield, offering a substantially larger payout than VIG. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric VIG SCHD Max drawdown (5 y) -20.39% -16.86% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,617 $1,393 What's Inside SCHD tracks 101 U.S. companies screened for dividend strength and quality, with the fund now over 14 years old. Its biggest sector allocations are energy (19%), consumer defensive (18%), and healthcare (18%). The top holdings include Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT +2.36%), Texas Instrument Inc (TXN 1.15%), and Chevron Corp (CVX +1.03%), giving the portfolio a notable tilt toward industrials and oil majors. VIG, by contrast, spreads its assets across 338 holdings, favoring technology (28%), financ...

Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St. Nvidia is investing $2b in CoreWeave and expanding their collaboration to build AI infrastructure. CoreWeave is integrating its software platforms more deeply into Nvidia's ecosystem. The company has launched its first integrated brand campaign during the Winter Olympics. CoreWeave introduced CoreWeave ARENA, an AI native platform for testing and optimizing enterprise AI workloads at scale. CoreWeave, trading as NasdaqGS:CRWV, is drawing fresh attention after Nvidia's $2b commitment and closer partnership around AI data centers. The stock last closed at $89.95, with a 16.5% return over the past 30 days and a 13.4% return year to date, while the 7 day return shows a 3.5% decline. For investors watching the buildout of AI infrastructure, this combination of capital, partnerships and recent share price moves helps frame where CoreWeave currently sits in the public markets. Alongside the Nvidia deal, the Winter Olympics brand campaign and the launch of CoreWeave ARENA indicate that the company is working to stand out with both enterprises and developers. For readers, a key consideration is how CoreWeave will seek to translate this expanded collaboration and new platform into adoption of its AI infrastructure and software offerings over time. Stay updated on the most important news stories for CoreWeave by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on CoreWeave. NasdaqGS:CRWV 1-Year Stock Price Chart Why CoreWeave could be great value Investor Checklist Quick Assessment ❌ Price vs Analyst Target : At US$89.95, CoreWeave trades about 29% below the US$127.22 analyst consensus target, but with a very wide target range from US$41 to US$251. ❌ Simply Wall St Valuation : Shares are described as trading 161.6% above estimated fair value, which flags a stretched valuation on this model. ✅ Recent M...

Find your next quality investment with Simply Wall St's easy and powerful screener, trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide. Tesla (NasdaqGS:TSLA) is winding down production of its Model S and Model X vehicles to convert facilities for large scale Optimus humanoid robot manufacturing. The company is publicly repositioning itself from a primarily electric vehicle maker to an AI and robotics focused business. Speculation continues around a possible combination of Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, which could reshape how these businesses operate and are funded. For investors, this shift reframes Tesla from an auto manufacturer to a broader technology and automation platform. Humanoid robotics and AI remain early in commercial adoption, and Tesla is tying its identity and capital allocation more closely to those themes rather than to legacy premium EV models such as the Model S and Model X. Key questions include how quickly Tesla can scale Optimus production, what real world use cases emerge, and whether any merger with SpaceX or xAI moves beyond speculation. These developments may influence how the market evaluates Tesla’s risk profile, revenue mix, and its role across mobility, robotics, and AI infrastructure. Stay updated on the most important news stories for Tesla by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on Tesla. NasdaqGS:TSLA 1-Year Stock Price Chart Why Tesla could be great value Investor Checklist: Tesla’s AI and Robotics Pivot Quick Assessment ⚖️ Price vs Analyst Target : At US$411.11, the share price sits about 2% below the US$418.81 analyst price target, which is within the 10% band. ❌ Simply Wall St Valuation : Tesla is described as trading at about 212.8% above estimated fair value, which flags a rich valuation. ❌ Recent Momentum: The 30 day return of roughly 4.7% decline shows recent softness in the share price as this new direction beds in. Check out Simply Wall St's in depth va...

Explore how IEFA’s developed-market focus and cost structure stack up against IEMG’s emerging-market exposure and sector mix. While both the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG +2.50%) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA +2.27%) offer broad international equity exposure at low cost, IEFA trades at a marginally lower expense ratio and yields more, whereas IEMG has outperformed over the past year and covers riskier, higher-growth emerging markets. IEMG and IEFA are both core international ETFs from iShares, but they track different global slices: IEMG focuses on emerging markets, while IEFA excludes the U.S. and Canada, and emerging economies, instead targeting developed markets in Europe, Asia, and Australia. This comparison highlights where each fund stands on cost, performance, risk, portfolio makeup, and trading ease. Snapshot (Cost & Size) Metric IEMG IEFA Issuer IShares IShares Expense ratio 0.09% 0.07% 1-yr return (as of 2026-01-30) 35.3% 26.6% Dividend yield 2.5% 3.4% Beta 0.65 0.85 AUM $141.4 billion $174.1 billion Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. IEFA looks a bit more affordable with its 0.07% fee compared to IEMG’s 0.09%, and it also pays a higher dividend yield by nearly a full percentage point, which may appeal to income-focused investors. Performance & Risk Comparison Metric IEMG IEFA Max drawdown (5 y) -37.16% -30.41% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,106 $1,353 What's Inside IEFA holds about 2,589 developed-market stocks across Europe, Asia, and Australia, with its largest sector weights in financial services (22%), industrials (20%), and healthcare (11%). Top positions include ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding Par AG, and HSBC Holdings PLC. The fund has a 13.3-year track record and is designed to mirror developed markets outside North America. IEMG, in contrast, tracks around 2,725 stocks from emerging eco...

There are several great investment opportunities in the AI sector. If you've got $5,000 ready to invest that isn't needed for monthly bills or to boost an emergency fund, I've got a list of stocks that look like excellent buys. All of them are key beneficiaries of massive artificial intelligence (AI) spending and look primed to soar throughout this year and many years to come. I think Nvidia (NVDA +8.01%), Broadcom (AVGO +7.26%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM +5.48%), and Microsoft (MSFT +2.00%) all make for excellent buys right now and should crush the market moving forward. Nvidia Nvidia, the world's most valuable company (as measured by market cap), has risen to this level thanks to insatiable demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs). These computing units have become the primary option for training and running AI models. Even after the company saw three years of strong growth, 2026 looks like another great one. Expand NASDAQ : NVDA Nvidia Today's Change ( 8.01 %) $ 13.77 Current Price $ 185.65 Key Data Points Market Cap $4.5T Day's Range $ 174.62 - $ 187.00 52wk Range $ 86.62 - $ 212.19 Volume 8.9M Avg Vol 183M Gross Margin 70.05 % Dividend Yield 0.02 % Wall Street analysts expect 52% growth for Nvidia in fiscal 2027 (which just began and will end in January 2027). While some investors may be worried about investing in Nvidia's stock right now because an AI bubble may be forming, the reality is far from that. Nvidia is providing the picks and shovels for the AI gold rush. It will do just fine even if the gold rush eventually peters out. With its strong projected growth over multiple years, Nvidia stock is a no-brainer buy for me right now. Broadcom One company challenging Nvidia's dominance in the AI chip sector is Broadcom. Instead of launching a competing GPU, Broadcom is taking a different approach. It has designed ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) that are getting a lot of attention from AI hyperscalers. ASICs optimize the com...

Key Points Silver prices are up 6% for 2026 after extreme volatility in both directions. Wheaton Precious Metals has returned 98% over the last 12 months, but by one metric, shares are cheaper than a year ago. Whether or not it's a buy at today's levels comes down to one question. 10 stocks we like better than Wheaton Precious Metals › Amid all the volatility silver prices have seen in 2026, they are still up by double digits for the year as of early February. Shares of Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE: WPM) are up 11.4% year to date, and zooming out over the last 12 months, they have returned 98%. Looking at the precious metals company's rise, it's natural to wonder if its rally is over. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 59 certainly makes it look expensive at first glance, considering that the average S&P 500 company is priced far more cheaply with a P/E ratio of 29.6. ' Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks » Yet there's one good reason to think that this stock is actually much cheaper than it appears. Not only that, it's even cheaper than it was a year ago, before its near-100% rally. Putting Wheaton Precious Metals' valuation in context To understand this company's valuation, you need to know its business model. Wheaton Precious Metals doesn't mine silver, gold, or any other metal. Instead, it provides financing for mining projects in return for the right to buy portions of the mines' future output at heavily discounted prices. For instance, the company's 2023 deal with Waterton Copper entitles it to buy hundreds of thousands of ounces of silver from the latter's Mineral Park Mine in Arizona for a whopping 82% discount to spot price in return for $300 million in up-front financing. As another example, it bought the right to buy up to 18 million ounces of future silver production from the Blackwater mine in Cariboo, Canada, at...

Key Points Nvidia and Broadcom are each vying for AI computing unit market share. Taiwan Semiconductor fabricates most chips used in AI. Microsoft stock looks like a bargain following its earnings report. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › If you've got $5,000 ready to invest that isn't needed for monthly bills or to boost an emergency fund, I've got a list of stocks that look like excellent buys. All of them are key beneficiaries of massive artificial intelligence (AI) spending and look primed to soar throughout this year and many years to come. I think Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM), and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) all make for excellent buys right now and should crush the market moving forward. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks » Nvidia Nvidia, the world's most valuable company (as measured by market cap), has risen to this level thanks to insatiable demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs). These computing units have become the primary option for training and running AI models. Even after the company saw three years of strong growth, 2026 looks like another great one. Wall Street analysts expect 52% growth for Nvidia in fiscal 2027 (which just began and will end in January 2027). While some investors may be worried about investing in Nvidia's stock right now because an AI bubble may be forming, the reality is far from that. Nvidia is providing the picks and shovels for the AI gold rush. It will do just fine even if the gold rush eventually peters out. With its strong projected growth over multiple years, Nvidia stock is a no-brainer buy for me right now. Broadcom One company challenging Nvidia's dominance in the AI chip sector is Broadcom. Instead of launching a competing GPU, Broadcom is taking a different approach. It has designed ASICs (application-specific...

The Best Stocks to Invest $5,000 in Right Now Nasdaq

Andrii Dodonov A weekly overview of insider trading, highlighting significant purchases and sales by investors, directors, and executives. The transactions occurred between February 2, 2026, and February 6, 2026. Johnson & Johnson ( JNJ ) CEO Joaquin Duato sold 100,000 shares in the price range of $220.99 to $221.48 per share, for a total of $22.12M. Following the transaction, he continues to hold 307,807 shares. Johannes Oosthuizen, President of the U.S. Market at Merck ( MRK ), disposed of 15,000 shares at an average price of $121.87 per share, totaling $1.83M. His holdings stood at 21,197 shares after the sale. At Micron Technology ( MU ), EVP of Global Operations Manish Bhatia sold a total of 26,623 shares within the price range of $388.78 to $395.87 per share, resulting in proceeds of $10.41M. He continues to hold 323,486 shares. Goldman Sachs ( GS ) disclosed two insider sales in the week. CEO David Solomon let go of 272 shares at an average price of $938.92 per share for $255,387, retaining 16,171 shares. Meanwhile, Global Treasurer Carey Halio sold 2,846 shares in the price range of $921.25 to $932.81 per share for total proceeds of $2.64M, leaving her with 2,017 shares. Daniel Simkowitz, co-president at Morgan Stanley ( MS ), sold 32,968 shares at an average price of $182.61 per share, for a total worth of $6.02M. Following the transaction, his holdings stood at 359,137 shares. Intel ( INTC ) disclosed that EVP and CFO David Zinsner purchased 5,882 shares at an average price of $42.50 per share, for a total investment of $249,985. Following the purchase, he held 247,392 shares. Robert Ford, chairman and CEO of Abbott Laboratories ( ABT ), acquired 18,800 shares at an average price of $107.13 per share, amounting to $2.01M. His total holdings increased to 469,508 shares. GameStop ( GME ) Director Lawrence Cheng bought 5,000 shares at an average price of $22.87 per share, representing a total purchase value of $114,368. He now holds 88,000 shares. Internation...

Insider trades: Merck, Intel, Micron among notable names Seeking Alpha